A cheeky little hummingbird
Outdoor Ontario

A cheeky little hummingbird

Guest · 8 · 1456

mr.sharp-photo

  • Guest
Had fun watching 4 hummingbirds play around. They would take turns playing King of the Castle and sitting on dead leaves.

Making faces:

Ruby-throated hummingbird by mr.sharp-photo, on Flickr

"Mooooon Riiiiiver...."

Ruby-throated hummingbird by mr.sharp-photo, on Flickr

"I see you, Mr Photography Guy..."


Ruby-throated hummingbird by mr.sharp-photo, on Flickr

The fauxhawk (kids these days...)


Ruby-throated hummingbird by mr.sharp-photo, on Flickr


Ruby-throated hummingbird by mr.sharp-photo, on Flickr
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


Irene

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 464
    • http://www.flickr.com/ravynne40
I added the one with the tongue sticking out as one of my favorites on flickr.
Terrific series of a beautiful little bird, you really captured his playful personality. Congrats.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


Howieh

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 978
Can I assume these were shot at Rosetta MG? I was there after 3pm and they were still putting on quite a show but the light was not too great. Still lots of perching going on, which begs the question: I was shooting at ISO800 and it didn't occur to me until I got home that I should have lowered the ISO for the perching birds (or should I have?). I also have a monopod but I didn't use it; with the Canon 100-400mm lens (L IS) how does shooting handheld with IS on compare to using the monopod with IS off?

Of course I am assuming that I can get a good view using the monopod.

I don't remember anything like this from last year. I'm wondering how long we can expect them to hang around.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


mr.sharp-photo

  • Guest
Quote from: "Howieh"
Can I assume these were shot at Rosetta MG? I was there after 3pm and they were still putting on quite a show but the light was not too great. Still lots of perching going on, which begs the question: I was shooting at ISO800 and it didn't occur to me until I got home that I should have lowered the ISO for the perching birds (or should I have?). I also have a monopod but I didn't use it; with the Canon 100-400mm lens (L IS) how does shooting handheld with IS on compare to using the monopod with IS off?

Of course I am assuming that I can get a good view using the monopod.

I don't remember anything like this from last year. I'm wondering how long we can expect them to hang around.

i'm certainly no expert. i thought they'd be gone by last week. its getting cool at night and the flowers are starting to slowly wilt.
as long as there are food sources, i guess, you'll have visitors.
these are guys passing through and staying for brunch. not sure if they are here for a day or a few days, but the #s went from 2 last week up to 4 yesterday.

shooting: depends on what you want. if you're looking for in-flight shots, you need full sun. also depends what kind of camera you have. full-frame cameras are more forgiving with higher ISO, like that of 800. with full sun, i shoot with ISO at 600 or 800 (or sometimes 1000) and the shutter speed's close to 1/2000 with the f-stop down to 5.3. if they are perching, its a whole different ballgame. we're talking about regular ISO (200-400) to minimize background noise, the f-stop going up to f8 (usually the sweet spot for most lenses) and your shutter speed being set according to conditions.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


mr.sharp-photo

  • Guest
Quote from: "Irene"
I added the one with the tongue sticking out as one of my favorites on flickr.
Terrific series of a beautiful little bird, you really captured his playful personality. Congrats.

thanks! i was talking with the gent who usually shoots the hummers there. hummingbirds is a combination of:

skill (camera settings, knowing how to follow the bird, when to take a photo)
luck (right shot at the right time...for every 20 shots you take, you're lucky if 1 is a keeper)
patience (i've watched photographers chase hummingbirds around. seriously, there's no point. find an area that makes sense, and wait. and wait. and wait.)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


MEGHAN

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 1643
    • Instagram
If these were anyone elses photos I would say they are totally awesome and I would let them know that #1 and #4 are my favorite.
I would say these are truely stunning.
But because it's you, I'm not going to say anything.

Meghan
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Birds are a visual treat that reaffirms the joy and goodness of living. Birds are also the most elegant expression of life”.
Roger Tory Peterson


http://www.flickr.com/photos/luv2brd/


Howieh

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 978
Quote from: "mr.sharp-photo"
i'm certainly no expert. i thought they'd be gone by last week. its getting cool at night and the flowers are starting to slowly wilt.
as long as there are food sources, i guess, you'll have visitors.
these are guys passing through and staying for brunch. not sure if they are here for a day or a few days, but the #s went from 2 last week up to 4 yesterday.

shooting: depends on what you want. if you're looking for in-flight shots, you need full sun. also depends what kind of camera you have. full-frame cameras are more forgiving with higher ISO, like that of 800. with full sun, i shoot with ISO at 600 or 800 (or sometimes 1000) and the shutter speed's close to 1/2000 with the f-stop down to 5.3. if they are perching, its a whole different ballgame. we're talking about regular ISO (200-400) to minimize background noise, the f-stop going up to f8 (usually the sweet spot for most lenses) and your shutter speed being set according to conditions.

Thanks, makes sense to me but there was another photographer there and when I told him I was shooting at ISO800 he looked at me funny and told me I should be at 100 or 200. (sure, I thought to myself, dead birds, on a tripod with a remote shutter release might work!). Anyway I tried going below 800 but the light was too low so that experiment didn't last too long! Btw, my gear is a 50D and a 100-400 lens so noise at 800 is not too bad, and fwiw I do save the raw files just in case I get something worth 'tinkering' with later. So far all my visits to Rosetta have been during the afternoon but I am hoping to get there Tuesday morning for some better light? As of now Wednesday looks like a washout but the end of the week should be ok weatherwise.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


egret

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 764
lovely px

and my fav
is the last one!


Egret :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Egret