The research on plant intelligence
Outdoor Ontario

The research on plant intelligence

Shortsighted

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 3451
ATT:  Dr. John ...  I've recently read "The Light Eaters" by Zoe Schlanger, a book dedicated to presenting the research into what is being called plant intelligence.  I strongly recommend that you, or your wife consider reading it.  If you choose not to read it, no worries ... there will NOT be a test.  You may view plants in a whole new way.


Dr. John

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 528
Looks interesting.  I'll put it on my gift request list.


One of the most interesting nature-related books I've read in recent years is Entangled Life by Melvin Sheldrake - a fascinating exploration of fungi.  Another one is An Immense World by Ed Yong about animal senses.


Shortsighted

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 3451

Shortsighted

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 3451
I managed to find the two books that you suggested.  It was easier than I thought.  No need to order online.  No need for that itchy ski-mask, written instructions or even that get-a-way car.  Thanks again for the referral.


Dr. John

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 528
Great.  Will be interested to hear what you think.


Shortsighted

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 3451
OMG!  Nobody told me that there will be test.  Based upon the book titles I didn't expect it to be a bird course but an actual test, I may need to really pay attention now.  The Light Eaters has some mind-blowing theories and experimental results that support those theories.  I'm not into emoticons but there should definitely be one for an exploding head.


Shortsighted

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 3451
 What strikes me as emergent in these relatively contemporary nature books is not the acceptance of the continuing concept of the interconnections between all synthetic echelons of nature, heralded in the writings of previous decades, but by the newer notion that our need to compartmentalize as a tenant of scientific inquiry and experimentation in order to publish findings, obtain funding and achieve peer acceptance interferes with establishing a unified theory of how life really works. 
 
Indeed, trying to understand the entangled world (Entangled Life), from the unseen to the more tangible weight of giants, is virtually impossible when the organ of intelligence is under incarceration by the enchantment of boundaries themselves, in all their forms. The idea (from the book) that LSD, or any other mind-altering compound could somehow knock-down those boundaries and in so doing reveal a sweet global comprehension of how life has sanctioned a fluid continuity between species just underscores the desperation scientists must endure to continue their investigations. We safely grasp cause-and-effect as a linear equation when life may not function in a Newtonian fashion and may more closely resemble a mobius strip with inherent plasticity to boot. Since a study of the universe, from quantum mechanics to space time (which may ultimately erase the needed theory of dark energy and dark matter), also seems to function by magical rules and incomprehensible forays that similarly boogie outside the boundaries of our understanding, why can’t life be as intricate, as “not-as-we-know-it” and may therefore continue to confound man’s attempt to grasp the meaning of life.  Heck, if the Monty Python team couldn’t come to a satisfactory answer to that question then, under rising Fascism and Donald Trump, we may certainly not realize natural enlightenment by the next long weekend.
I just started Entangled Life by Merlin Sheldrake.  Must be a stage name ... so cool.
 
 


Dr. John

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 528
The natural world embodies complexity.  Humans tend towards reductionist views and simplistic pattern recognition, which were likely evolutionary advantageous (lions attacked us at the water hole the last few times, probably will again) but are problematic when trying to engage with and understand natural processes.  Magical and spiritual explanations can be understood as one attempt to explain the complex and unfathomable.  Unfortunately, there are many humans today who stick with the reductionism and simplicity as they justify their actions in (against) the natural world.


Shortsighted

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 3451
 As any living entity, homo sapiens have evolved (genotype and phenotype) to survive in a hostile world.  If we are to embrace epigenetics as a viable contribution to this form, which includes favourable alterations to behaviour, then there must be some inherent advantage to the species when behaviour is governed by a decision-making system based upon magical thinking. Our environment determines essential patterns of behaviour.  Success in that environment gives birth to complementary behaviour that makes room for provisions such as stories, past down from generation to generation as mythology.  These fanciful fabrications serve to assist future generations in grasping some meaning in the world at large even when ‘meaning’ is a human construct.  More fiction is sold than non-fiction.  In film format documentaries will never supplant the value of a tall tale, or fantasy stories.  We don’t curl up and eatpopcorn while watching a documentary about flatworms.  Although when a decapitated flatworm grows a new head ... well, that’s kind of cool.
 
 Reality is not easy, but fantasy is palpable, quick and satisfying.  Epigenetics through environment may have given rise to our predilection for drama over the elusive truth.  Drama is the handmaiden of fear.  An atmosphere of contrived dielectic favours tribalism, given buoyancy through propaganda, which are both agents of control.  Fear and intimidation, which offers immediate results for the ruthless few that wield it, use myth and stories to consolidate control over mass human behaviour, working like a drug, or like a fungus, so that mankind acts contrary to its own self interest ... bites nature here and there, inflicts one wound after another, uses chemical warfare (which is illegal) to acquire yet more power and then finally smothers the planet in carbon dioxide, like a pillow to the face of an ailing abused landlord.  Last time I checked there are no vacancies elsewhere.   Nonsense is easy and profitable.
 
 


Dr. John

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 528
It makes sense that we favour an engaging narrative over data.  A statistical analysis of which plants were safe to eat was never presented at the evening campfire in our hunter-gatherer days.  It was stories about what happened when so-and-so ate that plant that guided choices.  So we are more willing to believe a fictional narrative than a conclusive and rigorous scientific study.


Shortsighted

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 3451
 From the book Entanged Life we get lichen-infested ants committing unconscionable acts under the direction of lichen, using chemical means to influence ant behaviour.  Hordes of zombie ants climbing the vegetation ladder to their demise.  Makes me think of zombie commuters following each other and the insane ritual of travelling to a centralized workplace via the #401 in order to get to work, perhaps accomplish very little, and then endure stop & go traffic all the way home again, ultimately contributing to their own ill-health.  Still, the existence of zombie-ants is quite a revelation.

 Fictional characters have given us disease-tinged insults, such as: "yah scurvy barnacle," or "you poxy traitor," and "you syphilitic scoundrel."  To this we can add, "away with you ... you lichen-infested lunatic."  When can I use that expression today?   I’m really lichen it!


Dr. John

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 528
If you want to see really creepy footage of zombified ants, you can watch this segment of a David Attenborough program:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuKjBIBBAL8



Shortsighted

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 3451
Cool video, thanks for attaching.   Sir David A. has witnessed everything, hasn't he?  You know, ... climbing to the top in a ruthless single-minded fashion, irrational self-destructive behaviour and the presence of a strange-looking orange growth on the top of the head reminds me of something.  I just can't put my finger on what it is.  I wonder if lichen plays a role?