owl
Outdoor Ontario

owl

denis · 11 · 1770

denis

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 2165
just an experiment,in posting a pic,and by jove,i think i got it.
denis
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by denis »


skyviewer

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 238
    • http://www.daxton.ca
Thats a nice sharp pic denis.  The back ground is nice and clean with no noticeable noise as well.  
What were your settings, camera and lens?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by skyviewer »


denis

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 2165
thanks.
i used a canon 40-d with canon 500 f/4 lens + 1.4x extender. settings were:
ISO 200, f/5.6, 1/250 sec. tripod with gimball head was used.
denis
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by denis »


skyviewer

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 238
    • http://www.daxton.ca
Very nice i use the 40D as well with a 100-400mm.
That is pretty sweet you get nice sharp shots like that even when using the 1.4 TC.  The beauty of a high end lens like that.
I was lucky to see the barred owl in Thicksons woods back in October.

Cheers
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by skyviewer »


Bird Brain

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 2448
    • http://www.spnc.ca/
Denis ... beautiful photo!  

Jo-Anne  :)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Bird Brain »
Jo-Anne :)

"If what you see by the eye doesn't please you, then close your eyes and see from the heart".


JTF

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 769
Oh ya your got it for sure, nice closeup.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by JTF »
Paul O\'Toole


denis

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 2165
thanks jo-anne,and paul.
skyviewer: the 100-400 is a very good lens.i just sold mine.the best zoo lens! unfortunately,hand-held,the 40-d/500 mm, combo,is not a very good flight shot duo, for me at least,due to the heavy weight,and long focal lenght,which makes acquiring,and tracking your subject, very difficult.i,ve been experimenting with a 300 f/4 + 1.4x extender,and had some sucess,yesterday with geese.much easier to lock focus,and track,beeing much lighter,and affording a much wider field of view.
denis
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by denis »


mr.sharp-photo

  • Guest
we should talk about it in another forum, but, as i mentioned to you, denis, the cannn versus nikkon quality of images is day and night.
cannon pics always have that POP to them, whereas nikkon has more dull photos.

anyone know a way via photoshop to make nikkon pics look more like cannon pics?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by mr.sharp-photo »


denis

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 2165
yes yogi i agree,with another forum.
but i dont know,about canon,beeing that much superior to nikon.if at all.just look at paul,s pics! he,s using nikon.i think the determining factor is the glass.
denis
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by denis »


Moira

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 1327
Denis:  Just following up on some of your comments about hand holding.  I bought a flight brace from one of the Halls Road regulars (in an effort to get off my tripod!).  If you are interested, let me know and I will p.m. you his info.  I feel it was well worth the money - you may have seen some of the Halls Roads folks using it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Moira »


denis

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 2165
yes moira
i,d be interested. i have seen people using the " bushhawk ",and i have checked it out. please P.M. me.i,m curious as to what they are using
denis
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by denis »