I love it, man. You just happen to have a 400mm lens with you.
If I even had a 400mm lens in my hand I would be so excited that
I would need third generation image stabilization just to compensate.
As for, oh well, I'll just whip out my trusty 400mm and capture those
gulls is something that I occasional dream about before the alarm
sounds and I must snap back into reality. As for salvaging a single
frame from a whole series of shots, well that's par for the course.
Anyone who doesn't claim to do that is a slick-faced liar. Having an
intense burst-rate certainly helps the endeavour. By the way, nice digs.
Is that where you stayed? I didn't photograph birds either when I first
got a digital point-and-shoot. Tried to find interesting shots around
town, you know, patterns, textures, shapes, juxtaposition, humour,
etc. The GTA and its parks and ravines don't offer much variety for
landscape. The GTA is not exactly exotic. Eventually I couldn't find
any interesting subjects and I wasn't very good at it anyway. Then when
I got an entry-level DSLR I gravitated toward nature photography. It
has a more universal appeal and most people get it. The ART stuff is
not everyone's cup of tea, although I still like it. I just suck at it.