Kin - thanks for the information, I appreciate it. The only thing is, if it is actually part of an existing definition defined by a legislative body, it isn't stretching it. In fact, it can and should be considered part of the definition given its inclusion. With regards to the Grimsby NHO, was the bird being baited in order to bring it closer to watchers/photogs or just as amusement? Also, was it a wild bird or one that perhaps escaped from a place that had been responsible for its imprinting?
Cloaca - as stated above - The Migratory Bird Act is enforced by provincial Conservation Officers (CO's), and under Provincial laws, the birds listed as both specially protected raptors and specially protected birds (other than raptors) under the Provincial statute fall under the statutes of any laws which are being enforced, which included the Migratory Bird Act.
Attila