Camera advice, please.
Outdoor Ontario

Camera advice, please.

Faltorvo

  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 67
First off, I must warn all those that may try and help, I am a 100% camera newb. I know just a shade more then point and click. The last camera i owned was a $10 kodak disposable (hey don't laugh to hard) it's the perfect camera to sit in the bottom of ones tackle box for a summer.

I guess one could say i'm looking for photo album quality pictures from say 3 ft to 150 ft. Maybe 150ft is stretching it.

I like the though of it being a digi .

Anything out there in the $400 range that might cover this ?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Faltorvo »


ichiro17

  • Board Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 45
Not really.  Not if you are looking for something to capture birds 100 ft away with good detail.

That combo will cost you upwards of $5000

Learn to use a Canon G10 and it will get you very good, presentable results that you can proudly put in an album.  Its also a great camera to carry around and is very good and keeping detail.

As well, become familiar with Photoshop and/or other editing programs because the editing is where you can save some of those potentially 'lost' shots
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by ichiro17 »


Andreas Jonsson

  • Moderators
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 532
    • http://swiftbirder.wordpress.com/
I'm not quite sure what you mean by "photo album quality". I'm using a super-zoom compact digital camera (in my case a Canon PowerShot S3 IS) which you can get in your price range. However, I don't make prints, but it is great for documentation. Certainly good enough for web publication. Have a look at some of my photos, all taken at 50-150 feet or so. Note that these are low resolution crops (although my camera has a 12x zoom one generally has to crop the photos down so that the birds aren't too small in the final picture).

There are loads of super-zoom cameras on the market (you need 12x zoom or more, I would say) and image stabilization of some kind is a must.

You wont get digital SLR quality, but a super-zoom compact may be a good start.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Andreas Jonsson »


Napper

  • Frequent Users
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 1655
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Napper »
Interesting site you should check out is https://spaceweather.com/
flkr...http://www.flickr.com/photos/36614671@N06/   Recent updates 2017 old pics
You know your getting old when.....wait, what?


Kin Lau

  • Registered
  • Old Timer
  • *****
    • Posts: 848
With a $400- budget, a "superzoom" is likely your best bet, and the good news is that there's quite a few models that are decent.

Check the following review in Dpreview on superzooms http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/q109superzoomgroup . The Canon SX10 IS and Panasonic FZ28 look pretty good.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Kin Lau »