How can "bird-people" actually hate a species of birds? I often have longish reveries about what large urban centres' checklists would look like if there were no house sparrows, starlings and pigeons ... cavity-nesters like tree swallows and red-headed woodpeckers, to name but two (I watched a pair of red-headeds excavate a nursery in an old dying oak at Kew Gardens about 20 years ago -- it took over a week, and all the while, a small flock of starlings sat in the upper branches, watching and waiting -- when the cavity was nearly finished, the starlings chased them off and took over. I can't say I was indifferent about this exploitation of a native species -- in fact, I watched with sheer revulsion as the opportunistic Eurasians evicted the picids; if I could've intervened, I would've ran them out of town, so I sort-of understand this cormorant thing, and I'm as guilty as anyone re "The Golden Age."), but evolution has endowed these starlings with heaps of aggressive behaviour, and that's how it goes.
And so it is with the cormorant "problem." I just haven't done the leg-work on the subject to opine much more than this: the rationalizations used by MRTCA and the Anglers and Hunters bunch promoting the kill ("cull," if you're a PR rep) sound, well, fishy ... I'll get going on this, and I urge others who can leave their emotions in a hatbox on the bookshelf to comment. The "guano killing precious vegetation" argument? Fishy. The impact on, say, green herons reproductive success is moot, as far as I know at this point. Are some folks still on about them eating all "our" fish?
Some objective comments would be most enlightening ...
Sorry, Andreas, but if you're annoyed about this being in the "sightings" section, please move it to General Discussions, where we can see what readers have to say about all this.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by norman »
"If John Denver wasn\'t already dead, I guess I\'d have to kill him."